What is an audit?
Audits are independent, unbiased evaluations that verify the truthfulness of an organization’s claims, in financial statements, regulatory reports, and other business critical documents, etc.
Audits aim to ensure that the information being disclosed by an organization is reliable. This is important because these data—financial statements, compliance reports, information security, etc—are used for decision making. Inaccurate or false data creates a garbage in garbage out (GIGO) scenario for consumers of the data, which can result in poor decisions.
Audits are part of the governance process in many firms. If policies set the goals and guidelines for an org. And if controls are the processes or mechanisms to enforce those policies. Then, audits assess the effectiveness of those controls. While this implies independent external assessments, that’s not always the case. In fact, there are three main kinds of audits:
External audits are excellent examples of external collaboration because of their greater level of rigor and the involvement of independent third parties. The remainder of this article focuses on this topic.
External collaborations are when independent organizations come together to work on a shared project or goal. External audits, which are conducted at arms length, are great examples of this. The parties that collaborate across the different stages of the audit process include:
The use of audit prep consultants is more routine in audits with specialized requirements, such as GxP—Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), Good Laboratory Practices (GLP), or Good Clinical Practices (GCP)—and where successfully passing the audit is business critical. Prep firms play a critical role in ensuring that all documentation—including policies and controls—is organized and regulatory compliant. By reviewing and fine-tuning the necessary documentation and evidence, audit prep consultants significantly increase the organization's likelihood of a successful audit outcome.
One final comment about the beneficiaries. It’s worth noting that they can vary and include:
While the specific process an audit takes depends on applicable regulations, industry standards, and focus—financial, compliance, operational, etc—audits follow the typical steps.
When the audit is complete, all of the content is retained for record-keeping processes in case of legal or regulatory review. All three main parties—beneficiaries, auditor, and subject—typically archive the audited material and findings.
As previously mentioned, external audits are external collaborations. When conducting the audit, the auditors and subjects (auditees) work together. If pre-audit consulting is required, the subject (auditee) and pre-audit consultant collaborate. At the conclusion of the audit, the auditor reports the results to the beneficiary.
All the participating parties—the auditors, pre-audit consultants, and audit subjects—will have internal tools that will be used throughout the duration of their phase. For example, auditors have access to audit management software, project management, and analytical tools, such as Mircosoft Excel. On the audit subject or auditee side, internal control systems and enterprise applications will produce the data and documentation. However, when it comes to working together or supporting the actual external collaboration that occurs between the parties, it’s mostly email. There has been some adoption of purpose-built tools such as file-sharing solutions (e.g., Google Drive), document collection apps (e.g., ClustDoc), messaging/chat software (e.g., Microsoft Teams), and video conference software (e.g., zoom). But, perhaps ironically, the use of these disparate tools often increases email correspondence because the parties need to coordinate their effort across the multiple tools.
Email limitations are well known. Email makes the entire process much more confusing, with dozens of threads with hundreds of scattered messages and attachments. Not only does that mess make it difficult to track conversations and attachments, but it also reduces everyone’s productivity. The fact that those sensitive and confidential documents are distributed to everyone’s inbox increases the risk in breaches and creates numerous data graveyards. And that’s not the only security concern. Increasingly, email is a common vector for cyberattacks, e.g., BEC, and confidentiality accidents, such as inadvertent data disclosures. In a world where security and confidentiality are increasingly important, the use of email in audits can contribute to less efficient, less secure, and less transparent external collaboration.
TakeTurns is a new breed of external collaboration tools. It’s multimodal. Instead of delivering each capability via an independent tool, TakeTurns integrates all the features audit teams need—real time chat, asynchronous notes, file sharing, document collection, revision management—into a shared workspace we call a TakeTurns Flow™.
Each Audit becomes its own TakeTurns Flow, which is a single, cohesive workspace that’s shared between the auditors and the subjects. By keeping all the content and communications together, TakeTurns makes it easy to find everything. In addition, TakeTurns is also secure: it’s SOC2 Type 2 certified, each participant’s email is verified before they can join the flow, and the leaders can add or remove participants when required. This finer-grain control over participation helps avoid accidental data disclosure via misdirected emails. Finally, TakeTurns tracks all the activity in your flow, enabling you to see a complete timeline of all exchanged documents, requests, queries, and communications. The audit trail helps demonstrate thorough due diligence and adherence to compliance standards. To learn more, visit TakeTurns and how it supports audit, visit: https://www.taketurns.com/solutions/audit